what do i have to file to get my dog back

Frequently Asked Questions on Lost Pets
Christopher A. Drupe (2010)

Q. What steps tin can I take before my pet gets lost to maximize my adventure of getting it dorsum?

Q. My pet simply ran abroad from home, what should I practice?

Q. I lost my pet several months agone and I call up I saw it at a firm on the other side of town. How exercise I get my pet back?

Q. Can I sue an animal shelter for putting my pet to slumber?

Q. I found out that my lost pet was adopted by another family from a shelter and I desire it back. What can I do?

Q. I found a devious pet and don't know what I should do.

Q. ...what if I want to keep the pet?

Q. ...what if the pet needs medical assist or needs to be put to sleep?

Q. My neighbour always lets his pet roam outside without supervision. Can I have it to a shelter?

Answers

<clear_format>

Q. What steps can I take before my pet gets lost to maximize my gamble of getting it back?

A. Information technology is very wise to take certain measures to protect yourself and your pet in instance it gets lost. About cities require dog owners to annals their domestic dog with the local authorities. Taking this step is of import because information technology may requite you extra legal rights and improve your chances of existence reunited with the domestic dog if it is taken by animate being command.

It is also wise to put a collar or tags on your pet with your contact information and then if it gets lost it tin can be easily reunited with you. This is especially important for outdoor cats because many people do not put tags or collars on their cats.

Perchance the all-time mensurate you can take is to microchip your creature . About shelters and veterinarians scan for microchips and many are actually required past law to do then. Microchipped dogs notice their style back to their owner about 52.2% of the time as compared to 21.9% for ones without microchips. Microchipped cats are reunited with their owners 38.5% of the time but only 1.8% of the time if they are not microchipped.

While stories of microchips causing cancer have emerged, the American Veterinary Medical Association strongly encourages microchipping anyway because the hazard of cancer is so small compared to the risk of losing your pet. Since devious pets may ultimately die while stray or become put to slumber if unclaimed at an animal shelter, death is more likely to result by an possessor's failure to microchip their pet.

Q. My pet just ran away from dwelling, what should I do?

A. If your pet ran away from domicile, there are several things you should practise. First of all you should contact local veterinarians, animal shelters, and creature control agency. At that place may exist more than than ane animal shelter in your city and oftentimes there are shelters for the metropolis and shelters for the county. Do a thorough job locating and contacting all possible places. Keep to bank check upwardly over the next several days as your ownership rights over the animal may be extinguished in equally little as 2 days if you lot practice not find and repossess it.

In addition to contacting local animal agencies and veterinarians, y'all should post observe of your lost pet in your neighborhood and community. This way, if someone finds your pet they can reach you. If someone decides to keep the pet, your effort to discover the pet may give you a greater legal edge in courtroom.

Q. I lost my pet several months ago and I think I saw it at a house on the other side of boondocks. How do I become my pet back?

A. Sometimes when pets wander away from home they will be adopted off the street past well-meaning citizens. If y'all lost your pet and call up information technology is living in another abode, there are a few things to go along in mind.

Get-go of all, you may want to visit the habitation and tell them what is going on. Yous can inquire to look at the animal upward shut to see whether it is actually yours. If it is your pet, hopefully the people volition be kind enough to turn information technology over. If they do not turn it over you can always exercise your rights in court.

Your legal correct to become the pet back will depend on a few things. If the adopter took your dog right off the street your rights will probably be governed past the traditional legal dominion assuasive the "true owner" of property to repossess it. Nevertheless, this "right to reclaim" may exist lost if you did non make a reasonable effort to find the pet, meant to carelessness the pet, or waited a long time to bring the issue to court.

In a few states, your right to get the pet back may be governed by a lost belongings statute. Lost holding statutes require people who find a wallet of money on the basis, for example, to put upwards fliers and newspapers ads as well as report it to the police. If the owner does not reclaim the property within a few months, it may become to the finder, go to the local government, or be sold at auction with the income shared between the finder and government. It is possible that these laws will apply to pets in some states although information technology is unclear because most courts have non decided the issue.

If the pet was adopted from an creature shelter, yous will probably exist unable to get the pet back. Beast control laws allow stray pets to be impounded for a holding period that only lasts a few days. If the owner does not come forward during that time to reclaim the pet, the shelter tin either identify it for adoption, sell information technology to a inquiry facility, or put it to sleep. The only way to become the brute dorsum from someone who adopted the pet from a shelter is to prove that the shelter did not comply with the police force. Perchance the shelter did not make reasonable efforts to locate the owner, did not concord the pet for the proper menstruation of time, or did not take the power to pick upwards the pet in the first identify.

Ultimately, if someone else has your pet and you want it back you should either endeavour to come to an understanding with the person who has your pet or consult with an attorney.

Q. Tin I sue an animal shelter for putting my pet to sleep?

A. Possibly. Equally discussed in the previous question, brute control laws allow shelters to hold devious pets and get rid of them after a holding menses that usually lasts a few days. If the shelter puts the pet to sleep, sterilizes it, sells it, or places it up for adoption after the holding catamenia the owner usually loses his or her right to go information technology back.

However, you may be able to sue the shelter if it failed to follow by the law. If it disposed of the pet in an illegal way, acquired it illegitimately, did not brand efforts to find the possessor, put the pet to slumber it without a reason, or did non go on the pet for the total holding menses and then it may exist liable to you for the impairment it caused.

An animal shelter might also be liable for dissentious a pet if you tried to repossess it before it was damaged. In one case, a court awarded damages to a canis familiaris possessor whose dog was sterilized after he asked for information technology back even though the holding period had already expired.

Lastly, the shelter might exist liable for violating your constitutional rights if its deportment were unreasonable. However, this statement is likely to fail every bit courts regularly uphold the government's power to have and dispose of stray animals. The shelter'south bear must be especially unreasonable and abnormal to rise to the level of a constitutional violation.

Q. I establish out that my lost pet was adopted by another family unit from a shelter and I want it dorsum. What can I do?

A. There may be very footling you can exercise if your pet was adopted by another family from a shelter. If the shelter complied with the local laws, it probably had a right to identify your pet up for adoption because of your failure to reclaim the pet within the property period. Await at in a higher place at the ii previous questions for scenarios where an possessor'due south rights may have been violated.

If you do recollect your rights have been violated, you will probably need to use legal processes to make the shelter to disclose the identity of the adopter and then you can inquire the adopter to render the animal or sue them if necessary. The court volition only order a shelter to disclose the adopter's identity only if it is relevant to your lawsuit and it will probably only be relevant if you allege that the shelter did not comply with the constabulary.

Q. I plant a stray pet and don't know what I should do.

A. If you observe a stray pet, your actions will depend on your ain values and desires.

If you are not interested in adopting the pet only want to help it out, you lot accept a legal right to take information technology in and care for it or to do zippo. If yous decide to help the pet you larn a duty to the pet'south owner to take reasonable care of it and brand reasonable efforts to reunite it with the possessor. You also acquire a duty to the rest of the world to go along them safe from the pet. In other words, you can be sued if you unreasonably crusade harm to the pet or to someone else because of the pet.

Once you take the pet, you lot can either agree on to it temporarily while you look around the community for the pet's possessor or you tin surrender information technology to beast control. If it ends upwards at an fauna shelter, in that location is a considerable chance that it will be put to slumber subsequently a brusk period of time so the nicest affair to exercise for the beast may exist to hold on to it while looking for its owner before surrendering information technology.

Q. ...what if I want to keep the pet?

A. If you want to continue the stray pet, you accept a few options and duties. You could simply take it into your habitation and get-go taking intendance of it. If you do this, you should at least put upward some notices in your local newspaper, courthouse, and community to give the owner a hazard to reclaim the pet. Your failure to requite notice is likely to give the owner legal ammunition if the issue ever goes to court. Equally mentioned earlier, giving discover to the customs may actually be required in some states.

Taking a pet directly off the street and taking care of information technology in your habitation has some risk. The owner of a lost pet tin come forward several months or even years after you lot showtime taking care of the pet and reclaim it. (The exact timing depends on the state and city where y'all live). This can exist painful for you if yous've formed a bail with the pet, and harmful to the pet likewise since a modify in lifestyle may be upsetting for it.

Considering it may take so long for an owner'southward rights to be extinguished if you lot but start taking care of a devious pet, the nigh efficient approach may be to take the pet to an animal shelter and adopt information technology afterward the holding period. The shelter will hold the pet for a few days and give the possessor a adventure to claim it. If the pet is not claimed, it will usually be placed for adoption.

Be sure to ask whether the animal volition be put upwardly for adoption and how long it has to concord the animal. Inform the shelter that y'all will be back to adopt it. In that location is a small adventure to the fauna that the shelter volition decide it'due south not fit for adoption or will euthanize information technology before you come back to claim it. However, if everything goes every bit planned you volition larn ownership rights in the pet in as little as a few days instead of a few years.

At least once land (Northward Carolina) allows you to look later the pet as an agent of the shelter and prefer it later the holding menses expires. This eliminates the risk that something bad will happen to the animal while waiting in the shelter.

Q. ...what if the pet needs medical assistance or needs to be euthanized?

A. If you find a stray pet that appears to demand medical assistance, there are a few things to keep in heed. The showtime affair to continue in mind is that ordinary people don't demand to do anything to help the pet although the humane thing to do is discover it help.

If you decide to intervene, you must make reasonable decisions. Although some states offer additional legal protection from liability if you are acting as a Good Samaritan, non all states do. Some places require that you make an effort to find the owner and put upwardly notices earlier you have the right to make decisions regarding the animal'due south well-being. If the state of affairs is an emergency such an effort is probably not necessary.

Since the pet appears to demand medical attending, the reasonable and humane thing to practice is bring it to a veterinarian. Be certain the veterinarian knows that you establish the animal and how much (if any) y'all are willing to pay for assist. Some states impose a duty on veterinarians to provide at least minimal assistance to alleviate animal suffering even if the possessor is not present, and some veterinarians may provide treatment out of compassion even if not obligated to do then.

If the veterinarian recommends putting the pet to sleep, the safest approach to have is to tell the veterinary that you exercise non experience comfortable making that authorization since you do not ain the pet. Some courts have upheld lawsuits against individuals who notice pets and authorize their destruction nether certain circumstances.

Q. My neighbour e'er lets his pet roam outside without supervision. Can I take it to a shelter?

A. Information technology is not advisable to have a pet roaming outside and dispose of it if y'all know who its possessor is. Offset of all, trapping a neighbor'south pet is not neighborly. You lot should try to mediate the dispute or at to the lowest degree put the owner on notice before taking any activeness. If the pet is bothering yous, so you can take the owner to court to compensate you for damages.

Second of all, you may exist guilty of theft or liable for damages to the pet if you accept it. Some courtroom decisions have actually permitted people to have their neighbors' roaming animals to shelters but there is no guarantee that all states would permit that kind of comport.  In fact, some states expressly make it a crime to keep lost property with cognition of its owner.

Lastly, such a drastic action as taking an fauna to a shelter could inflict emotional damage on your neighbor and result in the pet existence put to slumber.

Overview of Lost Domestic dog Laws
Rebecca F. Wisch (2006)

Different cruelty laws or impound laws, no state appears to straight address the effect of lost pets in its statutory code. Indeed, while many states define dogs and cats as the personal property of their owners past statute, these states exclude domestic animals from their lost property statutes. This is ironic because the understood value we place upon companion animals in our society and the level of regulation states apply to animals.

The common law (the constabulary that adult as a result of court decisions) generally holds that a finder of lost property has rights superior to anyone else in the property, except the true owner. Dogs and other companion animals are considered the personal property of their owners. Thus, the short legal answer to the question in a higher place provides that if a rightful possessor finds his or her dog, he or she then can affirm ownership.  The reality that a courtroom may consider other factors, such as how long the person who finds the domestic dog has cared for it, the efforts that take been fabricated by the original possessor, and the relative "value" each party has invested in the dog in terms of veterinarian or other care.

One important stardom must be made first when considering this legal question; that is, what is the status of the "finder?" Is the person who finds the dog an agent of the land (i.e., a local sheriff, brute control officer, or other police force enforcement agent) or is the person a individual political party?  The answer to this question will determine both the procedure for dealing with a lost pet and, most significantly, the fourth dimension frame an owner has to recover his or her pet.  In this discussion, both the status of a lost dog when the finder is a private private and when the finder is a state amanuensis will exist addressed.

Beginning starting time with the upshot of when a private party is the finder, it appears that only one court from Vermont has dealt with this event.  In that case, a mixed-breed puppy, who was trained by its owner to be a hunting dog, broke costless from its concatenation and was lost.  A couple of weeks later another person constitute the dog and took it in.  She so called the local humane gild (who advised her to continue the dog until information technology was claimed) and gave a description of the dog.  The finder also posted some printed notices around town and arranged for some radio broadcasts reporting her finding of the lost dog.  Subsequently the finder failed to hear back from the humane society or from any of the ads, she welcomed the canis familiaris into her home.

A twelvemonth afterwards, the original owner located the dog in the finder'due south thou and took it home.  The finder brought an action in court  to recover the canis familiaris.  In awarding ownership to the finder, the court noted the public policy interests in giving buying to the finder, such as limiting the roaming of stray dogs and encouraging care for lost pets.  Such a policy of giving a lost pet to a finder who makes reasonable efforts to locate the original possessor reduces the burden on public animal shelters as well as the number of animals scheduled for euthanasia.  The court found the finder's efforts met this brunt of reasonable efforts and the time period was long enough to justify giving her ownership of the dog.  ( See , Morgan v. Kropua , 702 A.2d 630 (Vt. 1997).

Whether this reasoning would be followed in states other than Vermont is unclear.  Would the courts in your state agree that reasonable efforts and time are sufficient to overcome the common law rule of an owner's superior interest?  Two states, Hawaii and Maine, really do mention the term "stray dog" in their dog statutes.  Hawaii law states that "[due east]very person who takes into the person's possession any devious dog shall immediately notify the animal control officer and release the dog to the animate being control officer upon need."  HI ST § 143-10 .  The animal control agency and then notifies the registered owner in writing if the dogs has tags.  This possessor so has twenty-four hours afterward the notice is given to reclaim the dog.  Should he or she fail to exercise so in that fourth dimension, or the canis familiaris does not have tags, the animal shelter and then retains the domestic dog for 9 days, whereupon it tin can exist sold or destroyed.  Similarly, Maine law also requires that a person finding a stray dog who takes control of that domestic dog either has to take it to the owner, if known, or to the fauna shelter where the dog was plant.  ME ST T.7 § 3913 .  The possessor then has six days to reclaim the dog from the shelter.

Two things become apparent from these two statutes.  Starting time, both states require that the dog is either returned to the owner or given to an animal control officer or shelter.  Second, these laws imply that the finder cannot retain the dog and must turn it over to municipal officials.  Thus, the rule from the Vermont Morgan case that reasonable efforts to detect the possessor while caring for the dog is not allowed by these statutes.

This issue is further muddied by the fact that twenty states accept enacted lost property statutes that set out a procedure when lost holding has been found.  These statutes gear up out a serial of steps a finder must follow when coming upon lost property.

Mostly, these statutes determine the process that a finder must undertake when finding lost property, which is ordinarily based on the monetary value of the found property.  In other words, a state will require further efforts on the office of the finder of valuable property versus ordinary, depression-valued items. Most lost mixed-breed pets will autumn into the low market place value statutory requirements. These laws require f inders to study and/or relinquish the property to local government, advertise the find in a local newspaper, or otherwise attempt to find the truthful owner.  After a menses of fourth dimension (anywhere from three to six months), the finder may claim ownership to the holding.

The trouble with these statutes is that they may specifically exclude "domestic animals" from their provisions. However, the phrase "domestic animals" could be construed by those courts to refer to only commercial animals or livestock and not companion animals.  This then leaves a vacuum in the constabulary for the legal status of lost and found pets.  D espite the fact dogs are considered personal property and no other statutes concern pets as lost belongings, these provisions may not employ to companion animals. Of the approximately 20 states and District of Columbia that have lost belongings sections, two specifically exclude domestic animals from their application ( New York and South Dakota ).  Those states that practise non explicitly exclude animals from their lost property statutes utilise a statutory process for finders of lost belongings.

Country lost property statutes reiterate the common constabulary notion that a finder'due south rights are inferior to those of the true owner. Nether near laws, a finder either becomes a bailee , a person to whom goods are entrusted or retained for a period of time, or a depository of the goods until he or she places them with constabulary enforcement. Connecticut , for example, makes a finder a bailee of lost goods, simply also requires the reporting of the notice to the local police force department.  Similarly, in Florida , a finder must relinquish possession to police enforcement officials.  In fact, "[i]t is unlawful for any person who finds any lost or abased holding to appropriate the aforementioned to his or her ain utilize or to decline to deliver the same when required" in Florida.

Nether most such statutes, the property is retained by either the bailee or the police department for a certain period of time. In Connecticut, a finder will exist notified after six months that no owner has come forrard to reclaim the goods. Conn. Gen. Stat. Ann. §§ 50- 12, 13 . The holding may then be turned over to the finder if he or she pays any applicable inventory fees to the police department. Florida police requires that a finder eolith a sum to encompass inventory and notification with the law when he or she brings lost property. Fla. Stat. Ann. 705.10 2 . As with Connecticut, Maine likewise allows a finder to recover the goods after half-dozen months, provided he or she pays one-half the value of the goods. Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 33, § 1056.

These statutes illustrate the difficulty in applying lost holding statutes to companion animals. What law department or shelter for that matter is equipped to retain lost pets for six months in accordance with the country law? Animals, while considered property of their owners, are not goods in the traditional sense. They must be fed, watered, sheltered, and given love and attending. Thus, even where the lost property statute mandates that the goods must be turned over the to the police, public policy may dictate that a finder of a lost dog or cat is entitled to care for the beast until the owner is located.

Oklahoma's law is and then perhaps the most applicative of all the lost belongings statutes to lost pets. Instead of applying a process where a finder must relinquish the goods to local authorities, finders become lawful baileees entitled to compensation for care of the goods. Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 15, §§ 511 .  A person is not bound by this police to take charge of the proficient, but, if he or she undertakes this responsibleness, statutory provisions must exist followed.  ( Click here for a list of state lost property statutes).

It should be noted that most states take statutes related to the taking up of "estays" or estray animals. These statutes, unremarkably dating back to the 1800's, accept generally been held by courts to comprehend simply agricultural animals that accept escaped their pens or pastures. Illinois' provisions under the Estrays and Lost Property Deed illustrate this distinction. The estray provisions of the Act state that "Any horses, mules, asses, cattle, swine, sheep or goats found straying, the owner thereof being unknown, may exist taken up as estrays in the aforementioned manner as provided for lost appurtenances." IL 765 I.L.C.Due south. 1020/1, IL ST CH 765 § 1020/i .  It is highly unlikely that a court would expand these antiquated statutes to include domestic cats and dogs.

While the lost property statutes may be inapplicable, information technology is possible that land licensing and registration laws may shed some light on the status of lost dogs.  The licensing and registration system for dogs strives to legally assign ownership for dogs and continue dogs from running at large.  In Michigan, for example, land law provides that the registration number assigned to a dog constitutes title to the dog owner.  MCL § 287.302 .  Thus, ownership of a dog is legally recognized when an owner receives tags for his or her dog.  The owner may so pass title to another individual by auction or other transfer.  This is meaning considering information technology reinforces the common police notion of a rightful owner under common law.

In fact, Michigan law too provides that one who takes upward a stray dog may receive compensation for boarding a domestic dog.  "Any person finding a domestic dog registered under the provisions of this act shall be entitled to the sum of 25 cents per mean solar day for boarding such dog, such board to be paid by the possessor. The commissioner of agriculture shall replenish such finder with the name and address of the owner, upon request."  MCL § 287.305 .  While this statute recognizes and in fact rewards a finder of lost pets who cares for the animal, information technology does petty to resolve the buying conflict.  Is the period of boarding indefinite while the finder bonds with the creature?

Finally, some states inadvertently recognize original title to dogs by criminalizing the stealing of dogs.  For example, Michigan has a specific law that makes it a misdemeanor to steal, confine, or secrete any licensed domestic dog.  MCL § 287.286b.   Likewise, New York as well has a dog stealing statute nether its department on licensing of dogs.  Under that law, an owner must report the loss or theft of any licensed dog inside ten days of the discovery.  NY Ag & Mkts. Constabulary § 113.   Such laws, like about other criminal laws, require a sure intent. Here, one must possess the intent to steal a dog, and will non be applicable to ane who merely takes up a devious dog.

It must as well exist made clear that the original question above presupposes that the beagle is lost and not abandoned.  This, of course, will be based on an analysis of the owner's intent when the beagle was lost and the surrounding circumstances (e.yard., did the beagle run out the door or was it "lost" by the side of the road far from its habitation?).  Under common law, championship to abandoned belongings, or property that is intentionally and voluntarily relinquished by the possessor, goes to the next person who possesses the property.  This rule of police force is oft statutorily granted to creature shelters; laws may explicitly country that when companion animals who are voluntarily "abased" to animal shelters, championship automatically passes.  However, abandonment of companion animals in unsuitable or illegal situations, such as on a roadside or at a veterinarian's role, may carry with it other legal ramifications.  In fact, under near cruelty laws it is violation to intentionally abandon a companion brute.  ( Click here for an case of the Florida animal abandonment statute).

All being said, there is very little guidance under state laws as to title for lost dogs. The exception is where the finding political party is the state itself.  If the person who finds the dog reports information technology to animal command, the dog volition exist kept for a period of time that is adamant past state police. Most all states mandate the seizure of loose dogs by state officials. These laws essentially empower local animal control agencies to pick upward companion animals found running at large. (Click here for a more on  land impound laws ). Unfortunately, many of these laws often allow swift activeness if the dog is perceived as a threat to public safety. That is, many of these statutes provide for the killing of any dog found at large. While this is clearly non a comforting thought, owners should understand that loose dogs will likely be seized and impounded if constitute by animal control or other constabulary enforcement. These animals are then kept for a statutorily proscribed length of time at an animal command facility (usually around seven days depending on state law). Virginia'south statute exemplifies such an impoundment law. The law explains that all dogs running at large without tags are subject to confinement. It so outlines the recordkeeping procedure for impounded dogs, the efforts the pound must employ to find the dogs' owners, and how a rightful owner may recover his or her canis familiaris. Va. Code Ann. § 3.one-796.96 . Regardless of how long an fauna is kept past law, owners should understand that they volition lose title to a pet much faster with when the finder is the state.

The detail incorporated into state impound statutes of contempo years illustrates the public policy concerns inherent in taking up a valued and perhaps irreplaceable piece of property.  Again, the Supreme Courtroom of Vermont has addressed the issue of championship when the finder of a lost dog is a state agent.  In Lamare v. Due north Country Brute League , 743 A.2d 598 (Vt. 1999), an unlicensed domestic dog escaped her grand and was later found by a couple who reported the detect to the local animal warden.  As required by the town ordinance, placed notices describing the domestic dog in the hamlet shop, post office, and town clerk's office. After belongings Billy for nine days from the appointment of impoundment without whatever response to the notices, Goff transferred Billy into the care and custody of defendant Due north Country Brute League, where Baton remained for approximately iii weeks.

A curt fourth dimension later, the original dog'due south owners contacted the Beast League who and so told them they must go through a formal adoption procedure.  During the application process, the canis familiaris was adopted out to another couple.  The dog's original owners then sued the Animal League and the case was decided for the League.  On appeal, the court again affirmed the decision in favor of the League, noting that the ordinance and public policy enabled the League to pass championship.

The town must have the power to brand some humane disposition of the fauna after a certain period of impoundment has expired. Plaintiffs' narrow construction of the statute would effectively compel the town to care for impounded domestic animals in perpetuity if the rightful owner never came forward, a result evidently at odds with reason and sound policy.

Lamarre at --.

Despite the broad authority state agents are given with regard to beast command, information technology is highly unlikely that whatever local agencies would enforce a "shoot at present, ask questions later" policy in this mean solar day and age. In fact, i California court has held that while local agencies are entitled to seize dangerous dogs under their constabulary power authority, due procedure requires that owners are given a meaningful opportunity to be heard at a hearing. ( Run into, Phillips v. San Luis Obispo Canton Dept ., 228 Cal.Rptr. 101 Cal.App. (2 Dist. 1986).

Once again, the brusque respond here is that a rightful owner has a superior ownership involvement as to a finder in a lost canis familiaris.  The example from Vermont explains that public policy may override this bones common law presumption to requite a finder who has employed reasonable efforts to find an owner legal title.  Two states, however, mandate that a finder take the stray domestic dog to an animal shelter instead of retaining it.  Clearly, a finder of a lost pet should report the finding to the local animal shelter who may be able to give some practical advice on what to do.  Like and so many areas of companion animal police force, the law itself has much progress to meet the reality of pet ownership.

johnsonthable1952.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.animallaw.info/intro/lost-dogs